Page 1 of 1
Texture
Posted:
Sat Mar 15, 2014 7:05 am
by quietwatersfarm
Re: Texture
Posted:
Sat Mar 15, 2014 11:25 am
by NCPaul
It is a way of classifying sausages; not what I'm used to, but that's OK. Have you read through the book QWF?
Re: Texture
Posted:
Sat Mar 15, 2014 5:28 pm
by quietwatersfarm
I have Phil, interesting read but suffers from 'the definitive guide' syndrome...effectively nothing of the sort and always makes you wonder if the publishers terms of reference are limited to the extent that they genuinely think it is, which deflates you a bit.
Funny classifications like you say
Re: Texture
Posted:
Sat Mar 15, 2014 5:37 pm
by wheels
As headings for chapters in a book, they're fine. But anymore than that? I'm not sure.
Phil
Re: Texture
Posted:
Sun Mar 16, 2014 12:31 am
by vagreys
Does look like it might be worth checking out from the library, at some point.
Re: Texture
Posted:
Sun Mar 16, 2014 1:01 am
by wheels
Sure, it must be.
I'm not criticising the book. It looks like it may be a good read and have lots of practical advice.
I think that I'm missing something here, how is "Whole Beast Butchery" different from the normal way of butchering? I know that I only buy half a pig at a time, but if I bought both halves how would that differ from "Whole Beast Butchery"?
I'm confused.
Phil
Re: Texture
Posted:
Sun Mar 16, 2014 8:38 am
by quietwatersfarm
Phil, its a term that has become popular, post Fergus Henderson, in the US to suggest harvesting and using all parts (including those that would otherwise often have been considered 'waste').
To many who have always valued how much of 'the beast' is useable its nothing new - to those whose experience is based around typical 'money muscles' it perhaps is.
Re: Texture
Posted:
Sun Mar 16, 2014 2:37 pm
by wheels
I thought that may be the case. Certainly the TV chefs are pushing the less popular cuts; the trouble is that the knock-on effect of it is that they increase in price.
Phil
Re: Texture
Posted:
Tue Mar 18, 2014 3:26 pm
by yotmon
wheels wrote:I thought that may be the case. Certainly the TV chefs are pushing the less popular cuts; the trouble is that the knock-on effect of it is that they increase in price.
Phil
How right you are Phil.
http://www.meat-prices.co.uk/wholesale/LiverpoolLooking at the pork prices listed here - it shows bellies @ 74p per kilo dearer than leg. Butt is even worse @ 88p per kilo dearer. It used to be that the further back you went on an animal the dearer the cost of the meat - not anymore. 35 years ago I was selling Pork leg at Christmas for £1.00 a pound (£2.20 kilo) and belly for 65p per pound. What will be next - offal ???
Re: Texture
Posted:
Tue Mar 18, 2014 5:14 pm
by wheels
I guess that it shows that 'Whole Beast Butchery', although how I got that from the link that QWF posted is (now) beyond me.
Those prices are the first time I've seen 'butts' dearer than loins though - and since when did Liverpool become part of the USA - butts?
Phil
Re: Texture
Posted:
Wed Mar 19, 2014 7:41 am
by quietwatersfarm
Re: Texture
Posted:
Wed Mar 19, 2014 4:39 pm
by wheels
No, that's a new one on me; I've not seen it mentioned elsewhere as far as I can recall. Do you have it? Any good?
Phil
Re: Texture
Posted:
Wed Mar 19, 2014 6:47 pm
by quietwatersfarm
I have her book 'Fat' which I like a lot and if this is anything like that will be worth a good read.
Re: Texture
Posted:
Wed Mar 19, 2014 7:38 pm
by wheels
Thanks, I'll put it on my 'to buy' list.
Phil