Swing Swang wrote:Thoughts
- curing isn't just about drying the product.
- in the same environment a 55mm casing is going to case harden assuming that you're trying to cure it at circa 3C in a condensing fridge, whereas a small diameter stick with chunky cut meat will dry much more evenly in any environment.
- the curing time to ensure the product is safe with respect to trichinosis is a function of salt content and casing diameter and this will take longer than two weeks, so the need for cure 2
- slowly drying at a higher temperature will favour a different population of bacteria etc which will create a different flavour profile
- of course you can omit both cures and dice with death...
There's lots of issues raised here and, in the main,
I agree with the conclusion that there is a need for cure 2 (or cure 1 plus saltpetre) particularly in a 'home environment'.
However, the question is how a commercial salami could be made with just cure 1 and ascorbate safely. I took that as my terms of reference in my reply above. As a purely academic exercise I note:
The
EFSA report leads me to believe that in a controlled environment with appropriate HACCP plan salami can be made safely using just nitrite. Bear in mind that cultures were probably used; I don't think that they have to be declared on the label as they're just a processing aide. I would recommend that everyone reads this report in full a few times and studies some of the test results closely. Some relevant bits I note that refer to this discussion are - in no particular order:
There is no convincing evidence that the residual amount of nitrite contributes to the microbiological safety of meat products. For example, in meat products containing ascorbate (or isoascorbate / erythorbate) the residual nitrite content is very low and sometimes below the level of detection, yet growth of C. botulinum is prevented.
Taken in conjunction with the tests for botulinum toxin that were made on every combination of factors tested, the presence of residual nitrite did not guarantee that the product would prevent growth of C. botulinum. Conversely, the absence of nitrite did not indicate that the product would support the growth of C. botulinum. The products that prevented growth of C. botulinum for the longest time at any storage temperature tested were those containing added ascorbate (or iso-ascorbate), which caused nitrite levels to
decline rapidly and often contained no residual nitrite.
nitrite is not effective in controlling Gram negative enteric pathogens in commercially prepared foods.
Examples are Escherichia coli (E. coli) and Salmonella
The products that prevented growth of C. botulinum for the longest time at any storage temperature tested were those containing added ascorbate (or iso-ascorbate), which caused nitrite levels to decline rapidly and often contained no residual nitrite.
The authors demonstrated that ascorbate, and also cysteine, enhanced the antibotulinum efficacy of nitrite in cured meat by sequestering metal ions in the meat rather than by an anti-oxidative or reducing mechanism.
The safety hurdles to make salami 'shelf stable' can be found here:
http://www.meatsandsausages.com/sausage ... ty-hurdlesThis shows that it is by making the salami more acid and reducing the water activity that we protect against most of the undesirable bacteria in our salami. The stated required EU level of an Aw of less than 0.90 is below the level at which C. botulinum will grow.
I'm not aware that any specific treatment for trichinosis is required in the UK, but an abridged version of the US rules can be found here:
http://www.meatsandsausages.com/sausage ... /trichinaeFor example a 2.5 inch salami with 3% salt fermented at 26.7C for 48 hours and then dried above 10°C would appear to require 17 days to be safe (I'm surprised it's so short a period?).
The recommended storage temperature is not necessarily an indication of the processing temperature.
The weight loss assuming 80% VL Pork would be nearly 40% and with a lower VL much more.
I'll reiterate, those are just observations for academic discussion. I'm not suggesting for a minute that anybody should abandon the use of nitrate for long term product safety just suggesting how it
might be done in a regulated environment with appropriate safety testing etc.
Phil