by RodinBangkok » Fri Dec 21, 2012 11:21 am
It is very difficult to advise on the internal temp, as it depends on so many factors. IMHO most of the conflicting info comes from the buffer everyone seems to add to cooking temps these days. If everyone followed the recommended cooking temps from the states there would not be a moist piece of chicken served there. Some Chef's I know for a fact may say for legal reasons to use a higher temp than they really use in their own kitchens. In their defense it is probably safer that way, especially in the states where people sue people for no reason. If you know your ingredients, and where they come from it gives you a notch up on using lower and more traditional cooking temps. If your using meats that have been processed, shipped frozen, then perhaps processed or repackaged again...IE big box type store meats, then I'd be more conservative about temps, as you may have no idea where those meats came from. Anytime I'm doing a new recipe for a crowd I'll test it to make sure I have the procedure down. Takes more time, but its well worth it.
I'd make a test batch, and make sure you use internal temp to cook them, pull one Ramikin at a lower temp and test it, then another at 10 degree higher, and so on. This will get you where you think you need to be. As far as max temp...well thats up to you is'nt it, I can't or won't try and convince you not to use 170, just giving you a heads up on reduced quality as the temps get higher.
The most important thing is to cook by internal temp, not time.
I'm a traditional poach pate person, so I would not cook anything ahead then put in ramekins, not really a good pate then IMHO.
Hope that helps, the best advise is to use very fresh ingredients, from a known source, then you can be more confident on your cooking temps.
I am the master of my fate:
I am the captain of my soul.
_____
Rod